The looming US budget crisis has been well documented. Sequestration seems to be just around the corner and the defense industry is already bracing for the catastrophic impact of an additional $500 billion cut to the DoD’s budget over the next 10 years. Other countries, especially those in Europe, are also feeling the effects and anticipating drastic austerity measures. What’s lost on some, perhaps, is that there are growth opportunities elsewhere. Countries such as Saudi Arabia, India, and Brazil, are beefing up their defense purchases and capabilities. In fact, the latest projections from SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute) indicate that many of these countries will have healthy defense growth rates for the next several years (see Figure 1).
So what’s driving this growth? Well, a number of weapons systems and R&D projects. But certainly UAVs are one of the more important areas. Several well-respected organizations project a tremendous amount of money spent on UAVs over the next 10 years, and this will almost definitely change the landscape of aircraft inventories. When we consider just the US inventory alone, we see 45 times more UAVs today than we had only 10 years ago (see Figure 2).
When we compare that to the US manned aircraft inventory, the trend becomes quite apparent – we’re steadily moving towards a 50/50 convergence between manned and unmanned assets (see Figure 3). Other countries and regions will follow (some quicker than others) as the US leads the trend.
Much of the growth, both domestically and internationally, can be attributed to the large UAVs. To that point, many countries around the world lack the capabilities and funding to either procure or manufacturer these larger, more complex systems. However, countries such as India and Brazil are forming partnerships today to help build those capabilities now so that, in the not-too- distant future, they can manufacture more expensive systems indigenously. Thus, the larger UAVs will continue to dominate total sales while representing only a small portion of the total volume (see Figure 4).
In terms of UAV growth, it should come as no surprise that the US has been the clear leader for some time now. However, other regions around the world have taken notice and will continue to enhance their defense arsenals by increasing budgets allocated for UAVs. Asia-Pacific and Europe are projected to be the leaders behind the US, with the Middle East, Americas, and Africa rounding out the rest (see Figure 5).
So, I think we can safely reference Malcolm Gladwell and say that we’ve reached the tipping point with respect to UAVs and their manned alternatives. Although we shouldn’t expect to see UAVs performing the more intricate, complex and dynamic missions such as air-to-air combat anytime soon, we should expect to them to take over the dull, dirty, and dangerous ones, thus leading to a strategic shift in aircraft inventories around the world.
Fly safe,
Marc

subscribe to Marc Luley's feed




Marc,
Why won’t we ever see UAVs completing more intracate missions or in air-to-air combat? Taking the pilot out of those situations seems to be the ultimate benefit. Will we ever get that far?
-Audrey
Manned aircraft are required for the more complex and intracate missions because of the incredibly dynamic nature of aerial combat. In “pilot-speak,” we refer to this as having the maximum amount of situational awareness, or SA. To build that SA, one not only obtains that information from sensors and displays, but also from visual means (i.e., what one can see from the cockpit). All that information must aggregated and processed in an extremely compressed time frame so that the right decisions can be made. This action is iterated hundreds of times during a normal sortie. The more complex a mission, the more times this must occur and in a shorter period of time. So, UAVs are limited both in terms of the amount of visual information that can be collected and in how quickly all sources of information can be aggegated, processed, and turned into actions. Thus, we tend to see UAVs perform missions that are labled dull, dangerous, and dirty. That being said, there is certainly a desire for UAVs to “master” the more complex missions such as air-to-air combat and CAS (Close Air Support). In my opinion, those technologies are a bit further out and I wouldn’t expect to see anything in the next 10 years.
vcode